Eastman Kodak Co. v. Fotomat Corporation
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
HOOPER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Eastman Kodak Co. brought this action seeking an injunction against defendant Fotomat Corporation based upon the allegation of unfair competition, alleging that the defendant in connection with a large number of kiosks (also referred to as Fotomats drive-thrus or huts) was infringing upon Plaintiff’s trademark and trade dress and misleading the public into the belief that these kiosks were operated by the plaintiff and that plaintiff was the party developing the films left by customers for processing.
The defendant, after a denial of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Free Sewing MacHine Co. And Apsco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Doeskin Products, Inc. v. United Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Nationwide Independent Directory Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1974
- People ex rel. Dunbar v. Gym of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Deere & Co. v. Farmhand, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1982
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Photaz Imports Ltd., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1993
- Eastman Kodak Company v. Fotomat CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.