Legal Opinion
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Photaz Imports Ltd., Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 4, 1993No. 93-CV-6278PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
TELESCA, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This action arises from sales of film and disposable cameras by defendant Photaz Imports Ltd. d/b/a/ Filmart (“Photaz”) which plaintiff Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) alleges are violative of the Trade-Mark Act of 1946 (the “Lanham Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq., and related state law, and of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. Kodak alleges that Photaz packages its film and cameras so as to (i) infringe certain trademarks registered by Kodak (First Claim), in violation of Section 32 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114, (ii) infringe…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- The Coca-Cola Company v. Tropicana Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Coach Leatherware Co. v. Anntaylor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pilates, Inc. v. Pilates Institute, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- D'Anton Jos, S.L. v. Doll Factory, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Woodke v. DahmDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- Figved v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Air Transport Ass'n of America, Inc. v. CuomoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.