State v. Fry
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJ.M. Johnson, J.
¶1 Two police officers were informed of a marijuana growing operation at the residence of Jason and Tina Fry. When the officers approached the home, the smell of burning marijuana was apparent. Jason Fry did not consent to a search, and Tina Fry presented a document purporting to be authorization for medical marijuana. The officers obtained a telephonic search warrant, entered the Frys’ home, and seized over two pounds of marijuana.
¶2 At trial, Jason Fry (Fry) argued the marijuana evidence should have been suppressed because presentation of a medical marijuana authorization automatically…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. W.R.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. FryWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Roe v. TeleTech Customer Care ManagementWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. ReisWashington Supreme Court · 2015
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.