Hofman v. Hofman
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
This matter was referred to Francis Child, advisory master, who filed the following conclusions:
This is an action instituted by the wife for an absolute divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The marriage, residence and acts of cruelty complained of are fully proved. The petitioner was a bona fide resident of this state at the time of commission of the acts complained of and has ever since and for more than two years next preceding the filing of the petition continued to be such bona fide resident. The citation in this case was personally served upon the defendant by the sheriff of Essex…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Wisconsin v. TorinusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Stephenson v. StephensonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
- Rudin v. RudinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pierson v. PiersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Prough v. ProughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957