Legal Opinion
Inductotherm Corp. v. NJ Mfrs. Cas. Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 1, 1964PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
83 N.J. Super. 464 (1964)
200 A.2d 358
INDUCTOTHERM CORPORATION, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided May 1, 1964.
Mr. Kenneth J. Dawes for plaintiff (Messrs. Dawes & Dawes, attorneys).
Mr. Theodore W. Geiser for defendant (Messrs. Pindar, McElroy, Connell & Foley, attorneys).
BARLOW, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
In this action, tried by the court sitting without a jury, and in which the essential facts were not disputed, plaintiff Inductotherm Corporation seeks reimbursement for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Martin v. Bengue, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Gerkin v. Brown & Sehler Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by15 opinions
- Central Bearings Co. v. Wolverine Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Harford Mutual Insurance v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- American States Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Electronic Purification Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- SOUTHERN GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.