Legal Opinion

Cutner v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 28, 2003No. 25644PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

Antoine Cutner (“petitioner”) appeals his conviction, claiming the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the charge of possession with intent to distribute marijuana -within proximity of a school, and that the trial court erred by allowing evidence that indicated petitioner was a dealer of crack cocaine. We affirm in part, reverse in part.

Factual/Procedural Background

Petitioner was convicted, after a trial in his absence, of possession -with intent to distribute (“PWID”) marijuana and PWID marijuana within proximity of a school. Two days later, petitioner pled…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. White v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  4. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Browning v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MeansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Cutner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API