Legal Opinion

Cutner v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 28, 2003No. 25644Published

1Opinion of the Court

354 S.C. 151 (2003)

580 S.E.2d 120

Antoine CUTNER, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of South Carolina, Respondent.

No. 25644.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Submitted April 17, 2002.

Decided April 28, 2003.

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General B. Allen Bullard Assistant Attorney General David Spencer, of Columbia, for Respondent.

Chief Justice TOAL:

Antoine Cutner ("petitioner") appeals his conviction, claiming the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. White v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  4. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Browning v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API