Legal Opinion

Maas & Waldstein Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 9, 1929No. 156PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

This case involves a claim for interest on a claimed allowance of a refund. It grows out of the application to the facts, which will be briefly stated, of the following provisions of the Revenue Act of 1921, 42 Stat. 316:

“Sec. 1324. (a) That upon the allowance of a claim for the refund of or credit for internal revenue taxes paid, interest shall be allowed and paid upon the total amount of such refund or credit at the rate óf one-half of 1 per centum per month to the date of such allowance, as follows: * * *
“(2) if such amount was not paid under .protest but pursuant to an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Kings County Savings Institution v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Greenport Basin & Construction Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McKenney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  2. United States v. GutzlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  3. McKenney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API