Legal Opinion

McKenney v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 4, 1931No. J-667PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

This suit is for the recovery of interest under section 1324 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1921 upon an overpayment for 1917 of $101,031.27 allowed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue on March 18, 1923, and refunded by treasury cheek of March 26,1923. The question whether plaintiffs are entitled to recover interest upon the refund depends upon whether the statements set forth by the partnership, of which plaintiffs were members, in an application filed with the commissioner May 2, 1922, for determination of the excess profits tax for 1917 in accordance with the provisions of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tucker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Lasher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  4. Stauffer, Eshleman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  5. Maas & Waldstein Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  2. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  3. Lancaster Cotton Mills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  4. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  5. McKenney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API