Legal Opinion

Warner v. Fire Insurance Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1991No. G008645PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACOM, J. *

I. Introduction

The Warners appeal from a judgment of dismissal after the trial court sustained the demurrer of Fire Insurance Exchange (the insurer) to their first amended complaint. The Warners seek recovery from an all-risk homeowner’s policy issued by the insurer to the Morrises (the insureds) from whom they bought a residence. The trial court ruled the policy did not cover the Warners’ claims for damages for negligent misrepresentations made by the insureds in the course of selling the property.

We affirm because there was no damage to tangible property during the time…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Royal Globe Insurance v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Fresno Economy Import Used Cars, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Giddings v. Industrial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gunderson v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Chatton v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Hurley Constr. Co. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Devin v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API