Legal Opinion

Newell v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1924No. Appeal, No. 9PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

Plaintiff, while crossing a street in the City of Pittsburgh, at night, caught her foot on the edge of one of the stepping stones and fell, causing injuries for which this action was brought to recover compensation. The jury returned a verdict in her favor, which the court subsequently set aside and entered judgment for defendant, assigning for reason the proofs failed to disclose a defect in the crossing sufficient to impose liability on the city.

The negligence charged in the statement of claim was the permitting of ice and snow to accumulate in ridges on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Borough of Mauch Chunk v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  2. Purcell v. RiebeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. German v. McKeesport City (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Davis v. PotterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Bosack v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Henn v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Kuntz v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API