Legal Opinion

In re Grogan

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided January 24, 1997No. Crim. No. 3:96CR30-APublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAYNE, District Judge.

Upon application of the United States pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 42(b), the Court, on November 5, 1996, ordered William K. Grogan to show cause why he should not be found guilty of criminal contempt under Title 18, United States Code, Section 401(1), and punished for that contempt by fine or imprisonment. The Order to Show Cause (“Show Cause Order II”) charged Grogan with two *994separate counts of criminal contempt.1 For good cause shown, and upon agreement of the parties, Count One of Show Cause Order II was dismissed by Order dated January 16, 1997. The…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API