Legal Opinion

Titus & McConomy v. Jalisi

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 2, 1998No. 1433PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

The defendant/appellant, Hasan Jalisi, appeals the order compelling arbitration on the basis that the trial court erred in finding that his “uncounseled consent to arbitrate a fee dispute cannot be withdrawn[.]” We reverse.

The facts of record disclose that the appellant was provided legal services by the plaintiffiappellee, Titus & McConomy. The appellant disputed the legal fees and filed a complaint with the Special Fee Determination Committee of the Allegheny County Bar Association (ACBA) to resolve the matter. Thereafter, both parties executed an “Agreement to Arbitrate” on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. Int. L. G. W. U.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Goldstein v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Mendelson v. ShragerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Britex Waste Co. v. Nathan Schwab & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Canuso v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kopew, D. v. Toll Brothers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API