Titus & McConomy v. Jalisi
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
The defendant/appellant, Hasan Jalisi, appeals the order compelling arbitration on the basis that the trial court erred in finding that his “uncounseled consent to arbitrate a fee dispute cannot be withdrawn[.]” We reverse.
The facts of record disclose that the appellant was provided legal services by the plaintiffiappellee, Titus & McConomy. The appellant disputed the legal fees and filed a complaint with the Special Fee Determination Committee of the Allegheny County Bar Association (ACBA) to resolve the matter. Thereafter, both parties executed an “Agreement to Arbitrate” on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Goldstein v. Int. L. G. W. U.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Goldstein v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Mendelson v. ShragerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Britex Waste Co. v. Nathan Schwab & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Canuso v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kopew, D. v. Toll Brothers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020