Legal Opinion

Carter v. American Fruit Growers, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 16, 1926No. 12014PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was rendered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Second appeal. 130 S. C., 280; 125 S. E., 641. The action is to recover the alleged purchase price of 16 carloads of watermelons alleged to have been sold during the season of 1922 by the plaintiff to the defendant. The complaint contains 16 separate causes of action, each consisting of an alleged sale and purchase of a carload of watermelons at a stipulated price. The total sum alleged to be due upon all the causes .of action, after the allowance of certain credits by payments on account, is $2,540.90, for which judgment was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tuley v. BartonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  2. Foulks v. FallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Burns v. GoddardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  4. Perry v. JefferiesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  5. Burwell & Dunn Co v. ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Redmond v. StrangeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  2. Chandler v. People's National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. Moody v. StemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API