Arndt v. Arndt

Introduction

Edward Arndt (“Ed”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment modifying his maintenance obligation to his ex-wife, Paige Arndt (“Paige”).1 The motion court found a substantial change in circumstances based upon Paige’s employment and reduced Ed’s monthly maintenance obligation from $4,444 per month to $2,489. On appeal, Ed claims that the motion court should have terminated (or further reduced) his maintenance obligation because the motion court improperly computed Paige’s income and reasonable expenses. Ed also contends that the motion court abused its discretion by awarding Paige…