Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Street Improvement District No. 343

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 30, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellant urges that the chancellor erred in decreeing the deposits of the moneys of the districts in the failed hank special deposits or trust funds within the meaning of § 1 of act 107 of 1927, and entitled to priority of payment over general creditors, as such. The law designates all creditors of a bank, of which the commissioner has taken charge, “classifiable” either as “secured creditors,” “prior creditors” or “general creditors,” and expressly provides:

“ * * * (4) The owner of a. special deposit expressly made as such in said bank, evidenced by a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Officer v. OfficerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Paul v. DraperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. Warren v. NixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Covey v. CannonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. RainwaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boone County Board of Education v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  2. Kansas City Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Grossman v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  4. Little Rock Street Improvement District No. 508 v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API