Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 18, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). The larv designates all creditors of a failed bank, of which the bank commissioner has taken charge, as either “secured creditors, prior creditors or general creditors;” and in act 107 of 1927, § 1, defines a prior creditor as follows:

“(5) The beneficiary of an express trust, as distinguished from a constructive trust, a resulting trust, or a trust ex-maleficio, of which the said bank was the trustee, and which was evidenced by a writing signed by said bank at the time thereof.” The instrument cre-^ ating the express trust of the funds deposited in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. Street Improvement District No. 343Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beaumont v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Pace v. State Use Saline County.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  3. Royal Arch Benefit Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. Bankers' Trust Co. v. Arkansas Rice Growers' Co-Operative Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Beaumont v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API