Legal Opinion
Roth v. Parker
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 2, 1997No. B100474PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, P. J.
In this automobile accident case tried to the court sitting without a jury, plaintiff appeals from “the court’s refusal to recuse itself prior to trial, and from the judgment of nonsuit” entered in favor of defendants Marie Clarisse Parker and Raoul Perez. On appeal, plaintiff challenges the court’s denial of her oral motion that the judge recuse himself, the granting of the motion for judgment, and portions of the award of costs awarding Parker expert witness fees.
Factual and Procedural Background
Our record, which contains only a partial reporter’s transcript, consists of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Jordan v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Rodriguez v. North American Rockwell Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Fish v. GuevaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jazayeri v. MaoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Brown v. BorenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Combs v. SKYRIVER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- People Ex Rel. Department of Motor Vehicles v. Cars 4 CausesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.