Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mynatt v. King

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Knox County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from • the Supreme Court.— Van A. Htjffaker, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

This proceeding was begun in the circuit court of Knox county under chapter 2 of the acts passed by the Fifty-Eighth General Assembly, at its second extra session. A petition was filed by the State of Tennessee, or relation of R. M. Mynatt, Attorney-General of the district, against Henry King;, charging him with engaging in the sale of intoxicating liquors and against Doll & Mynderse as agents of the owners of the building and premises in'whieh the unlawful business was being conducted. It was alleged that the business so carried on by defendant King was a public nuisance under the act…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Timothy v. HowseTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State ex rel. Estes v. PersicaTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Tennessee Fertilizer Co. v. McFallTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  4. East Tennessee Brewing Co. v. CurrierTennessee Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pass v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Gilson v. GilliaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  3. State v. MonroeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. Solberg v. Sunburst Oil & Gas Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Drainage Dist. No. 4 v. AskewTennessee Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API