East Tennessee Brewing Co. v. Currier
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM KNOX. Appeal from tlie Chancery Court of Knox County.— W. D. Weight, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green
The complainant brewing company was engaged in the manufacture and sale of beer during the two years from November 30, 1907, to November 30, 1909. For this period it paid the brewer’s license taxes, required by the revenue acts of 1907 and 1909, to the State and county. Chapter 547, Acts of 1907; chapter 479, Acts of 1909.
We find, however, from the proof in this case, which we have orally discussed, that during said period, com*539plainant sold beer to others than dealers, and otherwise than in original packages of five gallons each.
In both of the revenue acts just cited, fixing the liquor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Harrison v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Foppiano v. SpeedTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by18 opinions
- Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Magevney v. KarschTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
- People v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bryson v. BramlettTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
- American Can Co. v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.