Legal Opinion
Castillo v. SEIU 32BJ New England
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 2, 2020No. 1:20-cv-11220Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS RONALEY CASTILLO, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * Civil Action No. 20-11220-ADB * SEIU 32BJ NEW ENGLAND, * * Defendant. * * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT BURROUGHS, D.J. Presently before the Court is Defendant SEIU 32 BJ New England’s (“Local 32BJ”) motion for a more definite statement. [ECF No. 5]. Castillo did not oppose the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the motion, [ECF No. 5], is GRANTED and Plaintiff Ronalcy Castillo (“Castillo”) is directed to file an amended complaint. I. BACKGROUND Pro…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- James L. McCoy Administrator of the Electrical Workers Trust Funds, Etc. v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.