Legal Opinion
School District No. 1 v. School District No. 45
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
Defendant DeWitt Henley filed a general demurrer to the further and separate answer of defendant School District No. 45, which demurrer was sustained; and, by stipulation, the facts, as distinguished from legal conclusions, alleged in the complaint and in the further and separate answer are admitted. They constitute all of the facts appearing in the record.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff was and now is a school district of the first class, and that defendant School District No. 45 was a school district of the second class in Multnomah county, Oregon; that defendants Kude, Dana and Mann,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Kinzer v. Directors of Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- People v. Brooklyn, Flatbush & Coney Island Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Knowlton v. BaumhoverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Henderson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- State ex rel. Ondler v. RoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Spiking School District No. 71 v. Purported "Enlarged School District R-IISupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Portland General Electric Co. v. City of EstacadaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Lothstein v. FitzpatrickOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- School District No. 7 v. WeissenfluhOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Hinkle v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.