Legal Opinion

School District No. 7 v. Weissenfluh

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1963PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court of Wallowa county declaring invalid the action of the defendant District Boundary Board in making changes in the boundaries between three school districts.

The requests for the boundary changes were made in two petitions filed with the defendant boundary board, in each case by three legal voters of the proposed new districts in accordance with ORS 329.730, which provides in part as follows:

“(1) The district boundary board may establish new districts on petition of three legal voters of a proposed new district if it finds that a new district…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. School District No. 3 of Adams v. CallahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State ex rel. Zilisch v. AuerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Anderson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Zawerschnik v. Joint County School CommitteeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Musick v. State Ex Rel. MilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SchraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. List Adoption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. School District No. 23 v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 11Nebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Mid-Willamette Air Pollution AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API