Legal Opinion
United States v. Adams
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided November 21, 1969No. 21,594PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Quinn, Chief Judge:
On initial review of the accused’s conviction by general court-martial of four offenses, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934, we set aside and dismissed, for insufficient evidence to support the findings of guilty, two specifications of alleged pandering. United States v Adams, 18 USCMA 310, 40 CMR 22. Thereafter, the accused petitioned for reconsideration. We granted the petition to consider the applicability of Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 23 L Ed 2d 57, 89 S Ct 1532 (1969), and O’Callahan v Parker, 395 US 258, 23 L Ed 2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. BeekerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. LongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. RoweUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. MayoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Gregory Cole v. Melvin Laird, as Secretary of Defense, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Schroth v. WarnerDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1973
- United States v. McLaughlinU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
- Holder v. RichardsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.