Legal Opinion
Lee v. Offenberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 14, 1969No. Civ. 32852PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff’s assignor leased certain printing equipment to defendants Dr. Max Offenberg, Marie Offenberg, and Leon J. Perales. Paragraph 20 of the written lease providéd that ‘ 1 if more than one Lessee is named in this lease the liability of each shall be joint and several.” Defendants defaulted, and suit on the lease was commenced on December 22, 1965. The Offenbergs answered, but Perales did not, and his default was entered January 19, 1966. A motion for summary judgment was made as to the Offenbergs, and this was denied on May 3, 1966. Attorney Friedlander sent a request for default…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Gill v. EpsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- United California Bank v. WoodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Adamson v. AdamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. GraceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- In Re KowalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Sandco American, Inc. v. NotricaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Jacobs (In Re Jacobs)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1985
- Heggie v. HeggieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.