Legal Opinion
Sweetland v. Cole
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 7, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2825PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Associate Judge.
This is an interference proceeding in which the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirmed the decision of the Examiner of Interferences, awarding priority to the senior parly, Cole. A single count is involved. It reads: “In a lubricating system for an automotive engine containing a body of oil exposed to contamination by deleterious solids, means to circulate the oil to the parts to he lubricated and to a filter casing, and a fine texture filter in said casing having an area and capacity so correlated to the size of the system and the contaminating…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Motor Improvements v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Domenech v. HavemeyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
- Thompson v. PettisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- In Re BijurCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wunderlich v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Arthur Liebscher v. Wilson P. BoothroydCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. Motor Improvements, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1937
- Writer v. KiwadCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Doherty v. DubbsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.