Moore v. Greene
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Judge
This is an interference proceeding relating to four counts, Nos. 1 and 4 being mechanical, and Nos. 8 and 9 being for the method. We here quote Nos. 1 and 4:
1. A polyphase arc electric furnace comprising a plurality of arcing electrodes, and means for unbalancing the current or voltage of one or more of the polyphase arcs.
4. A polyphase electric furnace, comprising a plurality of arcing electrodes, a polyphase circuit connected with said electrodes, and means for unbalancing the voltage supplied to one of said electrodes.
The history of the case to date is as follows:
On January 3, 1913,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- General Electric Co. v. SteinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arthur Liebscher v. Wilson P. BoothroydCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Writer v. KiwadCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Doherty v. DubbsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. NicholsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1939