Legal Opinion

Deponte Investments, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 19, 2004No. 02-141CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FUTEY, Judge.

This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Motion To Join BAMMF (6) LLC As A Real-Party-In-Interest. Plaintiff articulates three bases in support of its joinder request. Plaintiff maintains that defendant will not suffer any prejudice. As a corollary to this proposition, plaintiff asserts that defendant has been on notice of BAMMF (6) LLC’s (BAMMF (6)) status as the real party in interest since the first deposition was conducted in this case. Further, plaintiff contends that joinder of BAMMF (6) will not affect the substance of the allegations in the complaint. Defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. First Hartford Corp. Pension Plan & Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  3. Kanehl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  4. American Maritime Transport, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Deponte Investments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API