Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Mintz Law Firm, LLC

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 31, 2016No. Supreme Court Case No. 14SC1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabriel

~ {1 This cage presents several novel issues arising from a dispute regarding an attorney's charging lien. After a contingent fee plaintiff's initial attorneys were discharged for cause and replaced by successor counsel, initial counsel asserted a lien against any settlement or judgment entered in the underlying action and in favor of the plaintiff, The underlying action was subsequently settled, and successor counsel filed a motion to void the lien. Initial counsel responded by moving to strike successor counsel's motion and to compel arbitration, based on an arbitration clause contained in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Dudding v. Norton Frickey & AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. Lujan v. Life Care Centers of AmericaColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Gee v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. In re the Marriage of de KoningSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martinez v. MintzSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API