Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of de Koning

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 11, 2016No. Supreme Court Case 14SC152PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hood

$1 After a two-day permanent orders hearing in this divorce action, at which the parties presented extensive evidence regarding their finances, the trial court felt it lacked sufficient information to allocate attorney's fees under section 14-10-119, C.R.S. (2015), the provision governing such awards under the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act (UDMA), Therefore, the court chose to issue the decree dissolving the marriage along with permanent orders addressing parental responsibilities, child support, division of marital property, and spousal maintenance-but postponed its determination on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. E-470 Public Highway Authority v. 455 Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. In re Marriage of AldrichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. In Re the Marriage of JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. In Re the Marriage of BalansonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. In Re the Marriage of HuffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. of WrightColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. In re Marriage of LaFleur & PyferSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  3. Perfect Place, LLC v. SemlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  4. In re the Marriage of GromickoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  5. In re Marriage of RooksSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API