Legal Opinion

State v. Sensenig

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1985No. 14476PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This appeal focuses upon Idaho’s “multiple punishment” statute, I.C. § 18-301, and upon the proper scope of information to be presented in a presentence report. Wayne Sensenig stands convicted by a jury of conspiring to commit a robbery, aiding and abetting in the robbery, aiding and abetting a burglary related to the robbery, and encouraging a minor to come within the purview of the Youth Rehabilitation Act. He received concurrent, indeterminate life sen tences for the conspiracy and the robbery; a concurrent, indeterminate five-year sentence for the burglary; and a concurrent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. OldhamIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MauroIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. EubankIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State v. NezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. WolvertonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API