Legal Opinion

Wallace v. City of Winfield

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1916No. 20,543PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Cowley district court; Allison T. Ayers, judge pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

In this action Charles M. Wallace, the owner of a mill and mill dam on the Walnut river, seeks to recover the sum of $49,500 for water pumped and taken from his mill pond by the city of Winfield and sold by it to the inhabitants of the city. He also seeks to enjoin the defendant from going on with certain condemnation proceedings, the building of a dam and the appropriation of the water for the use of the people of the city.

To supply water to the city and its inhabitants the defendant has erected a plant upon a piece of land known as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford Co. v. HathawayNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Clark v. AllamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Kansas & Texas Coal Railway v. Northwestern Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Lake Koen Navigation, Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. KleinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Price v. High Shoals Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  2. State v. Kansas State Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Soden v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  4. Aeroville Corp. v. Lincoln County Power District No. 1Nevada Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State Highway Commission v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API