State Highway Commission v. Ford
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
This was a condemnation proceeding. The property owners, hereinafter called defendants, answered that the condemnor, hereinafter called plaintiff, was not seeking to take the land for any purpose for which it was authorized to exercise the right of eminent domain, and asked that it be enjoined. Evidence was taken on the application for a temporary injunction, which was allowed. Later, by stipulation, the same evidence was used on the hearing for a permanent injunction, which was allowed. The plaintiff has appealed.
No question of procedure is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smouse v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Wallace v. City of WinfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Howard Mills Co. v. Schwartz Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Mitchell v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Urban Renewal Agency v. DeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Concerned Citizens, United, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- State v. Boicourt Hunting Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
- In Re Condemnation of Land for State Highway PurposesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.