Legal Opinion
Shaw & Estes v. Texas Consolidated Oils
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 21, 1957No. 13055PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GANNON, Justice.
Plaintiff, Texas Consolidated Oils, a corporation, brought this suit against Shaw & Estes, alleged to be a partnership composed of Gaylord Shaw and Burnett Estes, as well as against Burnett Estes individually, alleging itself to be a cotenant with the defendants, in two certain oil and gas leasehold estates in Harris County, Texas, to wit: The Levy “A” Lease and the Rothschild Lease; and with the defendant partnership Shaw & Estes in an additional lease in the same county known as the Tuffly Estate “A” Lease.
The petition sets out that since about April 1, 1950, plaintiff has…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hanrick v. GurleyTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Willson v. Superior Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Burnham v. Hardy Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Ferguson v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Myers v. CrenshawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Cox v. DavisonTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Thornhill v. System Fuels, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Neeley v. Intercity Management Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
- Security Pacific National Bank v. Enstar Petroleum Co. (In Re Buttes Resources Co.)District Court, S.D. Texas · 1988
- Wilson v. TXO Production Corp. (In Re Wilson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.