Legal Opinion

Alarcon-Ozoria v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 21, 2021No. 4/21PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eric Antonio Alarcon-Ozoria v. State of Maryland, No. 4, September Term 2021. Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL LAW – DISCOVERY – MANDATORY DISCLOSURE The Court of Appeals held that the scope of the mandatory obligation of the State to disclose materials to the defense without request does not extend to materials held by a state correctional facility, which is not within the ambit of control by the State, does not regularly report to the State’s Attorney, and did not report to the State’s Attorney in the instant case. Maryland Rule 4-263(c)(2) obligates the State to disclose materials that “are…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Baltimore Transit Co. v. MezzanottiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. State v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Syed v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  2. Danshin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  3. Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  4. Syed v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API