Legal Opinion

Cagle v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 13, 2018No. 15/18PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHotten, J.

Wesley Cagle ("Cagle") seeks review of a ruling by the Circuit Court for Baltimore City that precluded Cagle from playing video excerpts of trial court testimony during closing argument. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed. We granted certiorari to answer the following question: "Does a trial court err in precluding a criminal defendant from using trial testimony video in closing argument?" For reasons stated below, we shall affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Factual Background

On December 28, 2014, Baltimore City Police Department Officers…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Rios v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mainor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Adkins v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  3. Colkley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. In re: Expungement Petition of Richard M.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API