Legal Opinion
Lamelza v. Bally's Park Place, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 6, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-4051PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WEINER, District Judge.
This is a diversity action arising out of an incident that allegedly occurred on April 4, 1983 at Bally’s Park Place Casino in Atlantic City, New Jersey. The plaintiff, George J. Lamelza, Jr., alleges in his amended complaint that Bally employees defamed him, served him a contaminated drink, and libeled him by circulating his picture to other casinos.
Defendant, Bally’s Park Place, Inc., has filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons which follow, we grant the motion of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- CIPOLLA v. ShaposkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Leimgruber v. Claridge Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilson v. SlatallaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Sowell v. Hyatt Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993