Legal Opinion

Leimgruber v. Claridge Associates, Ltd.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 14, 1977PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hughes, C. J.

We certified, 71 N. J. 499 (1976), a judgment of the Appellate Division, whose unpublished opinion had reflected its difference of view with the trial court’s decision on a question involving punitive damages.

The relatively simple issue here stems from the mutilation by the defendant-respondent Claridge Associates, Ltd. (Claridge) of some 11 trees on the property of its adjoining land owners, Mr. and Mrs. Willy Leimgruber (plaintiffs). Claridge’s property was a large, elevated tract on which it was constructing, as observed by tire trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Finney v. LockhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Fisher v. VolzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  3. Beggs v. Universal CIT Credit CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Hensley v. Paul Miller Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
  5. Claude v. Weaver Construction CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  4. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Hurley v. Atlantic City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API