Allen v. Weber
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Wauhesha County. Action to restrain the defendants from cutting ice on the plaintiff’s mill pond, and for an accounting as to ice already cut and removed.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Wauhesha County. Action to restrain the defendants from cutting ice on the plaintiff’s mill pond, and for an accounting as to ice already cut and removed. The facts, as stipulated by the parties and found by the court, are substantially as follows: The United States conveyed by patent to one Alonzo K. Cutler the N. E. •£ of section 3, township 6, range 19 east, upon which quarter section are situated the so-called “ Mill Beserve,” and the land upon which the plaintiff’s mill stands, and the land owned by the defendants. That part of the Eox river which ran…
1Opinion of the Court
OutoN, .J.
The respondent is the owner of that part of the N. E. \ of section 3, township 6, range 19 E., which is known as the “ Saratoga Mills Property,” at Waukesha, and of that portion of the Mill Reserve and water used in connection therewith on the Fox river not heretofore conveyed to others.
The appellants are the owners of a strip of land containing' about two acres on the westerly side of the mill-pond of the plaintiff, on which they have erected an ice-house for *535ibe storage of ice cut from Eos river or said mill-pond for the use of Bethesda Brewery, and for other purposes. This strip…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Halsey v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Starr v. ChildCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
- Smith v. FordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Greene v. NunnemacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- People ex rel. Commissioners of Highways v. Board of SupervisorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ryals v. PigottMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Mayer v. GrueberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Brophy v. RichesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- United States v. Champlin Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- McADAM ET UX v. SMITHOregon Supreme Court · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.