Legal Opinion

McMahon v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 2009No. B206254PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KRIEGLER, J.

Government Code section 3306.5, part of the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (POBRA), grants covered officers the right “to inspect personnel files that are used or have been used to determine that officer’s qualifications for employment, promotion, additional compensation, or termination or other disciplinary action.” (Gov. Code, § 3306.5, subd. (a).) Appellant Walter McMahon, employed as an officer in the Los Angeles Police Department (Department), 1 was the subject of approximately 20 citizen complaints. The Department’s internal affairs investigation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Lake v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Poole v. Orange County Fire AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. City of Palm Springs v. Luna Crest Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Barber v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Poole v. Orange County Fire AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Poole v. Orange Cty. Fire Auth.California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API