Legal Opinion

Barber v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 2012No. E052296Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CODRINGTON, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

Petitioner and appellant Patrick Barber appeals from a trial court judgment denying his petition for writ of mandamus, seeking production of his *640personnel and internal affairs files (records) from California’s Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) under Government Code sections 3306.5 and 3309.5.1 The trial court rejected Barber’s records request on the ground he was not entitled to his records under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (POBRA) (§ 3300 et seq.) after termination from his employment with CDCR.

Barber contends…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API