Legal Opinion
City of Palm Springs v. Luna Crest Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 17, 2016No. E062654PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, J.
— Defendant, cross-complainant and appellant Luna Crest Inc. (Luna) opened a medical marijuana dispensary within the city limits of plaintiff, cross-defendant and respondent City of Palm Springs (City). The Palm Springs Municipal Code requires a permit to operate a marijuana dispensary in the City, which Luna did not obtain. Luna contends that the City ordinance requiring a permit is preempted by federal law and, therefore, invalid and unenforceable. This appeal arises from the trial court’s order denying Luna’s motion for a preliminary injunction. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- County of San Diego v. San Diego NORMLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Qualified Patients Assn. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Spielholz v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- McMahon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
3Cited by7 opinions
- BMC West Corp. v. Town Center Courtyard CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- City of San Jose v. MediMarts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- JCCrandall, LLC v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Limon v. Circle K StoresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- MTC Financial Inc. v. Cal. Dept. of Tax and Fee Admin.California Court of Appeal · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.