Legal Opinion

J. N. Reed v. Dean G. Parrack, D/B/A Lawn Mowing and Equipment Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1960No. 17934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Circuit Judge.

The question here is whether the District Court was warranted in finding that the accused device did not infringe the plaintiff-appellant’s patent. 1

Obscured in the probably unavoidable paténtese of the sole claim in suit 2 is a relatively simple device which, while not earth shaking in its importance, may be looked upon as a boon to our urbanized mechanical age. The machine is a power lawn edger. It is a hand-pushed apparatus somewhat smaller than a power lawn mower, with the cutting blade operated by a gasoline engine. Mechanically, its great contribution seems to be in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Wright v. YuenglingSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Thomas E. Bryan v. Sid W. Richardson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  5. Kinnear-Weed Corporation v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sterner Lighting, Inc. v. Allied Electrical Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Merry Manufacturing Company v. Burns Tool CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1962
  3. Aircraftsmen, Inc. v. Aircraft Equipment CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1965
  4. Harrington Manufacturing Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1971
  5. Specmade Products, Inc. v. BarnettDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API