J. N. Reed v. Dean G. Parrack, D/B/A Lawn Mowing and Equipment Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Circuit Judge.
The question here is whether the District Court was warranted in finding that the accused device did not infringe the plaintiff-appellant’s patent. 1
Obscured in the probably unavoidable paténtese of the sole claim in suit 2 is a relatively simple device which, while not earth shaking in its importance, may be looked upon as a boon to our urbanized mechanical age. The machine is a power lawn edger. It is a hand-pushed apparatus somewhat smaller than a power lawn mower, with the cutting blade operated by a gasoline engine. Mechanically, its great contribution seems to be in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Wright v. YuenglingSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Thomas E. Bryan v. Sid W. Richardson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Kinnear-Weed Corporation v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sterner Lighting, Inc. v. Allied Electrical Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Merry Manufacturing Company v. Burns Tool CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1962
- Aircraftsmen, Inc. v. Aircraft Equipment CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1965
- Harrington Manufacturing Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1971
- Specmade Products, Inc. v. BarnettDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.