Legal Opinion
Specmade Products, Inc. v. Barnett
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided April 16, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 7717PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOPER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this action are Specmade Products, Inc., a corporation of California, and Richard G. Butler, a resident of California, as owners of Patent No. 2990736 issued to plaintiffs on July 4, 1961 covering (in Claims 1 to 3 inclusive) a method of repairing tubeless tires, and (in Claims 4 to 10) the tools to be used therein, the inventor being Loid Crandall.
One defendant, J. A. Barnett, resides in Atlanta; defendants J. H. McDonald, A. McPherson and George B. Bowling, doing business as a partnership, also reside in Atlanta. Buxbaum Products Company of Ohio and E.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Kenneth Reiner and Frank A. Klaus, Jr., D/B/A Kaynar Company and Kaynar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. I. Leon Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Robertson Rock Bit Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Esme E. Rosaire v. Baroid Sales Division, National Lead CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Murray Company of Texas, Inc. v. Continental Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Specmade Products, Inc. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Specmade Products, Inc., and Richard G. Butler v. J. A. Barnett, D/B/A Barnett Supply Co., J. A. Barnett, D/B/A Barnett Supply Co. v. Specmade Products, Inc., and Richard G. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966