Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Neely
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 7, 1979No. 55736PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
372 So.2d 89 (1979)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Gary H. NEELY, Respondent.
No. 55736.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 7, 1979.
J. Doyle Tumbleson, Bar Counsel, Daytona Beach, and David G. McGunegle, Branch Staff Counsel, Orlando, for complainant.
Paul E. Raymond of Raymond, Wilson, Conway, Barr & Burrows, Daytona Beach, for respondent.
2Per curiam
This disciplinary matter is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar against Gary H. Neely, report of the referee, and the Bar's petition for review of the disciplinary penalty recommended by the referee. The sole question presented for our review is the propriety…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.
3Cases cited1 opinion
- The Florida Bar v. PahulesSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
4Cited by6 opinions
- Florida Bar v. RotsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- The Florida Bar v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Florida Bar v. NeelySupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- The Florida Bar v. NeelySupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- The Florida Bar v. NeelySupreme Court of Florida · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.