Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Neely

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 17, 1991No. Nos. 74077, 75043PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a lawyer disciplinary proceeding based on two complaints of The Florida Bar alleging three separate incidents of misconduct and reports of the referee recommending two thirty-six-month suspensions. The Bar seeks disbarment. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

I

In the first incident of misconduct, the referee found that the respondent, Gary H. *466Neely, was retained by Robert Reynolds to represent him on criminal drug and alcohol charges and related forfeiture proceedings. To secure his legal fees for that representation, Neely required Reynolds to provide collateral. Reynolds’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. NeelySupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. The Florida Bar v. NeelySupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. The Florida Bar v. NeelySupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. The Florida Bar v. NeelySupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. Florida Bar v. NeelySupreme Court of Florida · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. NeelySupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. In Re: Amendments to Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 5-1.1(g)Supreme Court of Florida · 2021
  3. In Re: Amendments to the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar (Biennial Petition)Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
  4. In Re: Amendments to the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar (Biennial Petition) – Corrected OpinionSupreme Court of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API