Legal Opinion

Zamora v. Pierson

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 30, 2001No. 00 C 1151PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HIBBLER, District Judge.

Omar Zamora has filed a Petition for Habeas Corpus pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a), or alternatively the All Writs Act Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss (doc. # 24) on the grounds Petitioner’s claims are non-cognizable for federal habe-as corpus review or are procedurally defaulted. For the reasons stated herein, Respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1994, following a jury trial, Petitioner Omar Zamora, was convicted of possession of more than 900 grams of cocaine…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Willhite v. WallsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  2. United States Ex Rel. Jones v. ChransDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API