Legal Opinion

Paul v. Smith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The question of the validity of a deed of the mortgaged premises, which was given by a mortgagor to the mortgagee in settlement and in discharge of the mortgage indebtedness, has been considered by this court in a number of cases. Smith v. Crosby, 47 Wis. 160, 2 N. W. 104; Rockwell v. Humphrey, 57 Wis. 410, 15 N. W. 394; Kunert v. Strong, 103 Wis. 70, 79 N. W. 32; Lynch v. Ryan, 132 Wis. 271, 111 N. W. 707, 112 N. W. 427; Young v. Miner, 141 Wis. 501, 124 N. W. 660; Coates v. Marsden, 142 Wis. 106, 124 N. W. 1057; Gutschenritter v. Hosterman, 201 Wis. 558, 230 N. W. 610. It was settled in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Interior Woodwork Co. v. BuhlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Rockwell v. HumphreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Wilcox v. CoumbeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Smith v. CrosbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Young v. MinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Acme Brick Co. v. Jacobi-Erdman, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Donohoe v. LandoeMontana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Osipowicz v. FurlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Connor v. ConnorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Waukesha National Bank v. DeweyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API