Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nashua Savings Bank v. Anglo-American Land-Mortgage & Agency Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 24, 1901No. 303Published

In Error to the Circuit Court of tbe United States for the District of New Hampshire.

1Dissent

ALDRICH, District: Judge

(dissenting). The plaintiff is an alien business company organized under what are known as the “English Companies’ Acts,” and I disagree with my associates upon ihe questions as to the sufficiency of tlie evidence to warrant a. verdict, and as to what is shown by the record, and as to presumptions of. evidence below not stated in Ihe record. In this case, at the close of all the evidence, contrary to the situation in Hansen v. Boyd, 161 U. S. 397, 16 Sup. Ct. 571, 40 L. Ed. 746, cited in the majority opinion, the defendant moved (lie court to direct a verdict, in Us…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining & Milling Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Great Western Telegraph Co. v. PurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Concord First National Bank v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API