Legal Opinion
Pyle v. Wolf Corporation
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 22, 1972No. Civ. 70-693 to 70-696PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SKOPIL, District Judge:
I
INTRODUCTION
This is an action for breach of an ex-ecutory accord. The plaintiffs are four individuals who among themselves invested $1,000,000 in a venture with defendant Wolf Corporation (hereinafter, “Wolf”) whose business is real estate, oil and gas exploration, and related enterprises.
In 1969 a partnership known as “Wolf 69” was formed for the purpose of exploring for oil on land in which Wolf had acquired an interest from King Resources Company. Wolf was the general partner and exercised managerial control over Wolf 69. The limited partners were obligated…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Teodore Dorotee Autera v. Manuel Dudley Robinson, Anthony C. Autera v. Manuel Dudley RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Cia Anon Venezolana De Navegacion v. Frank L. Harris and Pate Stevedoring Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Cummins Diesel Michigan, Inc. v. The FalconCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Kelly v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Washington Investment Ass'n v. StanleyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Callie v. NearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Callie v. NearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Sun Studs, Inc. v. Applied Theory Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Tabler v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Omaha Nat. Bank of Omaha v. MullenaxNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.